In
order to complete the lease of the property, a law would have to be
passed through the Board of Alderman and signed by the mayor. The
bill was submitted by our alderman and passed through the board vote.
When I got the paperwork, I noticed that the original proposed lease
document had been passed and signed. I asked why they changed their
minds only to find out they submitted the wrong bill. They quickly
submitted a repeal and replace bill (Board Bill 304) which included
the correct version of the lease with the shorter term and oversight
board requirements. That bill also passed the Board and was signed by
the mayor and all required parties.
We
were full speed ahead and very excited. We had hundreds of volunteers
lined up. It was spring break time and the weather was cooperating.
All we needed were the keys. We insured the building, as was required
by the lease terms and asked for the keys. We were told it would only
take a few days. We started working on the outside of the building.
We were cleaning, landscaping and painting. We asked to get let into
the building and started removing the trash and debris. The project
was on track and looked like it would soon be open.
As
we worked with a large volunteer group one day, we were told to leave
the premises. Immediately after this my emails and phone calls were
not returned. I still did not have keys but I had a signed copy of
the lease and insurance on the building. I couldn't understand what
the problem could possibly be. Several influential people agreed to
look into it for me. Everyone that did would soon stop returning my
phone calls and emails. I knew there was a problem but I never
expected what came next.
Approximately
three months after the lease was signed, over two years since we started the whole process, I got a letter from the city
of St. Louis. Are you ready for this? They didn't actually own the
building! They had offered an RFP to sell a building that they did
not own. They passed two bills through the Board of Alderman, had
both signed by the mayor, signed and executed a lease with us,
supplied us with copies of all of these documents and did not own the
building.
We
were floored. We had invested hundreds of hours and thousands of
dollars in the project. We had weathered all the issues and
obstacles. We accepted the restrictions and the shorter lease terms.
We arranged for and scheduled hundreds of volunteers. The cost to us
was staggering. We had taken on debt expecting to have facilities for
expansion. We shut down our woodshop in order to prepare it for the
move. We invested labor and money over a 2 year period. All we got
was a letter saying the city didn't own the building so the deal was over. The Penrose
Project was dead.
No comments:
Post a Comment